Tag: Stroke Risk

  • Certain Types of Birth Control May Raise Stroke Risk

    Certain Types of Birth Control May Raise Stroke Risk

    For millions of women, combined hormonal contraceptives are a routine part of life, offering a reliable and convenient way to prevent pregnancy and regulate menstrual cycles. However, new research is highlighting a serious, often underestimated concern: the risk of stroke.
    Image Credit: Pixabay

    For millions of women, combined hormonal contraceptives are a routine part of life, offering a reliable and convenient way to prevent pregnancy and regulate menstrual cycles. However, new research is highlighting a serious, often underestimated concern: the risk of stroke.

    Data presented at the European Stroke Organisation Conference suggests that combined oral contraceptives—those containing both oestrogen and progestogen—may notably raise the risk of cryptogenic stroke. This type of stroke is sudden and lacks an identifiable cause.

    Nearly 40% of Strokes in Young Adults Are Cryptogenic—Especially in Women—Highlighting Possible Sex-Specific Factors Like Hormonal Contraceptives, New Study Finds

    Notably, cryptogenic strokes account for around 40% of all strokes in younger adults, especially women. This points to possible sex-specific factors, such as hormonal contraceptive use, that may contribute to the elevated risk—an idea supported by the recent findings.

    At this year’s European Stroke Organisation Conference, researchers shared results from the Secreto study—an international effort aimed at uncovering the causes of unexplained strokes in young adults aged 18 to 49. The study included 608 patients from 13 European countries who had experienced cryptogenic ischaemic strokes.

    One of the most significant findings was that women using combined oral contraceptives were three times more likely to suffer a cryptogenic stroke than those who didn’t use them. This increased risk remained even after accounting for other contributing factors such as obesity and migraines.

    It’s already known that hormonal contraceptives containing both oestrogen and progestin carry a small but increased risk of serious health complications like ischaemic stroke, where a blockage disrupts blood flow to the brain.

    Large-Scale Study Links Combined Hormonal Contraceptives to Increased Stroke and Heart Attack Risks in Women, with Vaginal Ring and Patch Showing Highest Risks

    Further supporting these concerns, a large-scale study published earlier this year, which followed more than two million women, found that combined hormonal contraceptives—including pills, IUDs, patches, and vaginal rings—were linked to higher risks of both stroke and heart attack. Specifically, the vaginal ring raised stroke risk by 2.4 times and heart attack risk by 3.8 times, while the contraceptive patch increased stroke risk by nearly 3.5 times.

    By contrast, a progestin-only IUD showed no increased risk for either condition, suggesting that oestrogen may be the primary factor behind these elevated risks. Although the absolute risk remains low—fewer than 40 out of every 100,000 women using combined hormonal contraceptives will experience a stroke—the global implications are substantial due to the widespread use of these contraceptives.

    Combined hormonal contraceptives contain synthetic forms of the sex hormones oestrogen (typically ethinylestradiol) and a progestin, a man-made version of progestogen.

    Synthetic Estrogen in Contraceptives Amplifies Blood Clotting by Increasing Clotting Proteins and Reducing Natural Anticoagulants

    While natural oestrogen in the body helps promote blood clotting—an essential function for healing wounds and preventing excessive bleeding—the synthetic version used in contraceptives is more potent and delivered in consistent, higher doses. This triggers the liver to produce additional clotting proteins while reducing the body’s natural anticoagulants, shifting the balance toward easier clot formation.

    Although this response helps reduce bleeding, it also increases the risk of developing abnormal clots, which can lead to serious conditions like stroke. This risk is further elevated in individuals who smoke, suffer from migraines, or have inherited clotting disorders.

    If a clot forms in an artery supplying the brain—or travels there from another part of the body—it can block blood flow and trigger an ischaemic stroke, the most common form of stroke. Clots may also develop in deep veins, such as those in the legs or abdomen.

    Beyond clotting, oestrogen can also cause slight increases in blood pressure and impact blood vessel function over time, contributing further to stroke risk.

    Estrogen’s Clot-Promoting Effects May Underlie Increased Risk of Cryptogenic Stroke in Combined Hormonal Contraceptive Users

    These clot-promoting effects of oestrogen may help explain the recent findings linking combined hormonal contraceptive use with a higher risk of cryptogenic stroke—a type of stroke with no clear cause, but which may be driven by subtle, underlying factors like hormone-related clotting.

    These numbers may seem alarming, but the actual risk remains low. For instance, only one additional stroke is expected per 4,700 women using the combined pill each year.

    While rare for individuals, this risk adds up globally, given how many women use these contraceptives—helping explain the high rate of cryptogenic strokes in younger women.

    Many continue using them, either unaware of the risks or due to limited alternatives. This reflects a broader issue: women’s health research has long been underfunded and male-centered, leaving gaps in our understanding of how hormonal contraceptives affect women beyond birth control.

    Women deserve clear, accurate information to make informed choices. While the stroke risk is small, it’s still higher during pregnancy and postpartum. With better research and communication, women can choose the option that best fits their needs and health.


    Read the original article on: Science Alert

    Read more: Fish Can Choose Their Own Birth Timing—Here’s How

  • Indigenous People May Have a Higher Stroke Risk

    Indigenous People May Have a Higher Stroke Risk

    In highly developed nations, Indigenous people may have a higher stroke rate, according to a new study highlighting a dire requirement for more information and adequately designed studies.

    Every year, almost 12 million individuals worldwide have a stroke, which occurs when a vessel transporting blood to the brain is obstructed by a clot or the vessel ruptures and bleeds into the brain, triggering brain cells to die. Nevertheless, little is understood about stroke’s influence on approximately 370 million Native individuals worldwide.

    Stroke Research in Indigenous Populations

    Researchers reviewed data regarding the effect of stroke on Native populations in nations ranking high on the Health Development Index, a guideline designed by the United Nations to determine economic wealth, education, and life span.

    By concentrating on highly developed nations, researchers wanted to find the actual burden of the illness without the bias of poor health care access, stated the research’s lead researcher, Dr. Anna Balabanski, a stroke physician and neurologist at Alfred Health in Melbourne, Australia.

    They found twenty-four peer-reviewed abstracts and studies from seven nations from 1990 to 2022 that looked at stroke among Native grownups. Compared with respective non-Indigenous people, the study found age-standardized stroke rates were approximately two to three times greater in Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Australians, almost twice as extraordinary in Singaporean Malay people, and 8% to 2 times higher among Sámi people in Norway and Sweden. American Indians had a twenty percent greater stroke rate than non-Hispanic white people.

    The study will be presented on the 10 of February at the American Stroke Association’s International Stroke Conference in Dallas. The findings are initial until the total outcomes are published in a peer-reviewed journal.

    Balabanski’s Statement

    “These findings show the overall impact of colonization on health in these populations,” Balabanski stated. “If you do not have access to education, work, or healthy food, or if you have to travel hundreds of kilometers to see a doctor, those elements may predispose you to poor health.”

    Balabanski said healthcare professionals need to be more proactive regarding stroke avoidance and treatment for Native patients. Better healthcare education in Native communities is also essential, she stated.

    “While we can not change the historical intergenerational trauma, we can alter things going forward to offer Indigenous populations the best possible access to healthcare and the best opportunities for a healthy life.”

    The study was carried out in combination with a seven-person Native Advisory Board, comprised of Native researchers from worldwide. Balabanski stated that one constraint of how the original research was conducted is that Indigenous individuals were not associated with overseeing the studies.

    “It is critically crucial for Indigenous stakeholders to design, lead and review the study at every stage so it can have the greatest importance and effect,” she stated.

    The constraints in the study

    Balabanski stated that spaces in information availability and quality likewise restricted the study. Stroke rates might actually be higher than reported considering Indigenous individuals in remote locations may not go to the hospital. Even if they do, they may not identify themselves as Indigenous out of fear of discrimination, she stated.

    Dr. Hugo J. Aparicio, who was not involved in the research, stated that researchers “did a great job of assisting us to understand how insufficient the information is as we try to understand the threats of stroke in Indigenous individuals.”

    “The most crucial part of their research is demonstrating the requirement for stakeholder participation,” stated assistant professor of neurology at Boston University Chobanian &amp, Aparicio; Avedisian School of Medicine. “You require participation from the community experiencing these stroke disparities to assist in directing the research design, provide and help gather the data, and help detectives report the findings properly and in a way that will help the general public understand the enhanced risk.”

    The following action, he said, “is to address public health interventions that narrow these disparities.”

    Aparicio called for future studies concentrating on social factors of stroke in Native populations, including healthcare access, structural racism, and modifiable lifestyle elements. He likewise required more study in countries scoring low on the Health Development Index, saying, “these are nations where the disparities may be even more exacerbated.”


    Read the original article on Medical Xpress.

    Read more: Scientists Create a New Device to Detect Brain Tumors Using Urine.